Roadmap

Three resolutions toward digital clay.

Nanoshape is built around a single long-term bet: that programmable physical form is the next fundamental interface. The roadmap runs in three resolutions, each one pushing further toward that goal.

Resolution 1

Nanoshape 1

Shipping now
What it is

A macro-scale 10×10 vertical pin array shape board, designed to be real, visible, and immediately useful. Nanoshape 1 ships through pilot access to institutional partners who want to build with programmable physical form today.

What it does well
  • Renders terrain, surfaces, product forms, and data height maps in three dimensions
  • Drives all 100 pins simultaneously from a single transmitted frame
  • Connects to Shape Studio software via USB for real-time updates
  • Immediately tangible — no CAD software, no render pipeline, no fabrication queue
Honest limits

Nanoshape 1 is low resolution by display standards. The pins are visible; the grid is coarse. It is not a 3D printer and does not produce high-fidelity replicas. The actuation is not fully parallel in the Vatom sense — it is close, but serial-adjacent at the firmware level. The point is not photorealism. The point is that programmable shape is now available as a real institutional product rather than a research prototype you have to build yourself.

Who it's for

Universities, prototyping labs, design schools, HCI research groups, architecture studios, and innovation centers looking for an early-generation physical interface platform.

Request pilot access →

Resolution 2

Programmable Surface

Next phase
The leap

Resolution 2 is about density, fidelity, and software. Smaller pins, a denser grid, stronger software architecture, and deeper Vatom architecture tests. The goal is a surface that can render more complex forms with less visible stepping between states.

Open problems
  • Actuation cost per pin at smaller scale — the electronics get significantly more complex
  • Software abstractions for fine-grained control at higher resolution
  • Latency at higher pin counts — the frame transmission pipeline needs work
  • Fabrication repeatability — macro-scale manufacture is well understood, sub-mm is not
What partners can do

Institutional partners at Resolution 1 can co-design surface applications, contribute to control software, and run research studies on shape interaction at higher fidelity as development progresses. Pilot partners will have direct access to the engineering team as the Resolution 2 architecture develops.

Timing

Resolution 2 is the next development phase. No calendar dates — the work is underway and the scope depends on what we learn from Resolution 1 pilots.

Resolution 3

Digital Clay

Research horizon
The far bet

A programmable matter platform where any 3D form is on-demand and dynamic. Digital Clay is the long-term vision: a surface (and eventually a volume) that can be shaped arbitrarily, in real time, by software. Not a research curiosity — a product infrastructure for physical computing.

Honest framing

This is a research direction, not a product roadmap. Calling Digital Clay a product at this stage would be dishonest. What exists today is a serious theoretical framework (Vatom Theory) and a working Resolution 1 prototype. The path from here to Digital Clay runs through unsolved problems in actuation, materials science, and software. We are naming it because it is the thing we are building toward, not because it is imminent.

What would need to be true
  • Actuation density at sub-millimeter scale — individual units smaller than a grain of rice
  • New materials with suitable stiffness, compliance, and response speed at that scale
  • Real parallel deformation across thousands of cells simultaneously
  • Software primitives for programmable matter as a first-class interface concept
Why it is worth working toward

Every computing interface before glass-and-touch was also impossible until it wasn't. The transition from screen to physical form is not a question of whether — it is a question of which technical path gets there first, and who builds the infrastructure that makes it programmable rather than static. Vatom Theory is one answer to that question. Nanoshape 1 is the first physical argument for it.

Interested in partnering at any resolution?

Pilot access to Nanoshape 1 is open now. Partners at Resolution 1 get early access to everything that follows.

Request Pilot Access →